Main Page: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (32 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Header box | {{Header box | ||
| title = Motivation | | title = Motivation | ||
| color = | | color = teal | ||
| body = | | body = | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
{{Header box | {{Header box | ||
| title = Why an Open Standard is Needed | | title = Why an Open Standard is Needed | ||
| color = | | color = turquoise | ||
| body = | | body = | ||
[[File:Cooperation.jpg| | [[File:Cooperation.jpg|400px|frameless|right]] | ||
In environments where infrastructure is built over decades by many different actors using solutions from different vendors and manufacturers, systems become fragmented, making | In environments where infrastructure is built over decades by many different actors using solutions from different vendors and manufacturers, systems become fragmented, forcing operators to manage multiple incompatible tools and workflows while making daily operation, maintenance, expansion, and staff training increasingly complex and costly. | ||
This fragmentation often results in vendor lock-in, where systems depend on specific tools, expertise, or suppliers that may not remain available over the full lifecycle of the infrastructure. | This fragmentation often results in vendor lock-in, where systems depend on specific tools, expertise, or suppliers that may not remain available over the full lifecycle of the infrastructure. | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
<div class="hbox-row"> | <div class="hbox-row"> | ||
{{Header box | {{Header box | ||
| Line 111: | Line 92: | ||
These pages explain how to read, use, and contribute to the standard. | These pages explain how to read, use, and contribute to the standard. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Header box | |||
| title = List of Requirement Pages | |||
| color = brown | |||
| body = | |||
This index lists AOWIS pages that define normative requirements (MUST/SHOULD/MAY statements) and conformance rules. | |||
'''Dev Rules''' — specs for writing and maintaining AOWIS | |||
* '''REQ-AI:''' [[AOWIS:AI_Usage_Guide|AI Usage Guide]] | |||
'''Technical Standard''' — system behavior and data models | |||
* '''REQ-MEAS, REQ-MEAS-UI:''' [[Measurement:Units|Unit System Requirements]] | |||
* '''REQ-MEAS-UNI:''' [[Measurement:Unit_Identifiers|Unit Identifiers]] | |||
}} | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
{{Header box | {{Header box | ||
| title = | | title = AOWIS Documentation Structure | ||
| color = purple | | color = purple | ||
| body = | | body = | ||
AOWIS documentation is organized into dedicated namespaces with clearly separated purposes. | |||
The [[Standard:Main_Page|Standard]] namespace contains the normative requirements that define AOWIS compliance. The other namespaces provide the motivation, concepts, engineering knowledge, architectures, operational models, implementation guidance, reference designs, training material, and supporting information needed to understand, implement, and operate AOWIS systems. | |||
For a full overview, see the | * [[Motivation:Main_Page|Motivation]] – Causal justification of design requirements based on real-world failures, constraints, and operational realities. | ||
* [[Standard:Main_Page|Standard]] – The normative core of AOWIS. Defines requirements and definitions specifying what AOWIS-compliant systems MUST, SHOULD, or MAY do. | |||
* [[Concepts:Main_Page|Concepts]] – Core ideas, philosophy, rationale, and contextual understanding that explain AOWIS without prescribing a specific implementation. | |||
* [[Architecture:Main_Page|Architecture]] – High-level system structure, including controllers, layers, communication, data flows, and their interactions. | |||
* [[Infrastructure:Main_Page|Infrastructure]] – Physical technologies, systems, and components used in AOWIS deployments. Infrastructure pages describe classes of physical systems rather than specific implementation blueprints. | |||
* [[Measurement:Main_Page|Measurement]] – Definition and handling of sensor data, manual measurements, calibration, uncertainty, and derived physical values. | |||
* [[Data:Main_Page|Data]] – Data models, schemas, logging structures, synchronization formats, and data lifecycle rules. | |||
* [[Operations:Main_Page|Operations]] – Runtime behavior, control logic, state transitions, fallback behavior, and decision-making during system operation. | |||
* [[Modules:Main_Page|Modules]] – Reusable functional extensions that provide domain-specific capabilities within AOWIS. | |||
* [[Reference:Main_Page|Reference]] – Non-normative concrete implementations, engineering blueprints, example deployments, and validated design patterns showing specific ways AOWIS systems may be built. | |||
* [[Databases:Main_Page|Databases]] – Federated knowledge bases and structured supporting information used by AOWIS implementations. | |||
* [[Governance:Main_Page|Governance]] – Certification, compliance, auditing, trust, licensing, versioning, and organizational governance. | |||
* [[Training:Main_Page|Training]] – Operator education, technical training, field guidance, documentation literacy, and capacity building. | |||
* [[External:Main_Page|External]] – External projects, standards, technologies, and systems that relate to or influence AOWIS. | |||
For a full overview, see the [[AOWIS:Table_of_Contents|Table of Contents]]. | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 143: | Line 143: | ||
[[File:Boring.jpg|250px|frameless|right]] | [[File:Boring.jpg|250px|frameless|right]] | ||
== Roadmap == | |||
AOWIS has progressed beyond its initial conceptual phase. A substantial software foundation for modelling, simulating, visualizing, and eventually operating water infrastructure is under active development. | |||
The long-term objective is a complete open-source '''SCADA, infrastructure modelling, simulation, and operational management platform''' for water and agricultural infrastructure. Planning, simulation, live monitoring, control, maintenance, and historical data should ultimately operate on the same shared infrastructure model. | |||
EPANET currently provides the primary hydraulic and water-quality simulation engine, but AOWIS is not designed as an EPANET frontend. EPANET is one solver integrated into a broader, solver-independent AOWIS architecture. | |||
=== Current Software State === | |||
The current AOWIS software stack already includes several major components: | |||
; '''Shared infrastructure model''' | |||
: The AOWIS server model provides a common representation of water infrastructure independently of a particular simulator, user interface, or field controller. Pumps, pipes, junctions, reservoirs, tanks, valves, controls, measurements, and related infrastructure can therefore be represented consistently throughout the system. | |||
; '''Hydraulic and water-quality simulation''' | |||
: A dedicated EPANET integration layer translates between the AOWIS model and EPANET and executes hydraulic and water-quality simulations. The integration supports network import and export, hydraulic behaviour, controls and rules, pumps and valves, water-quality analysis, diagnostics, simulation reports, and other EPANET functionality. | |||
: | |||
: Integration of '''EPANET-MSX''' is being developed to extend this to advanced multi-species water-quality and chemical reaction modelling. | |||
; '''Network editor and monitoring interface''' | |||
: The AOWIS graphical application provides tools for creating, importing, inspecting, simulating, and visualizing water networks. This includes geographic map views, terrain-aware 3D visualization, network monitoring views, simulation configuration, and analysis of simulation results. | |||
; '''Geographic and terrain infrastructure''' | |||
: AOWIS includes mapping and terrain services for geographic placement, elevation data, basemaps, terrain visualization, and local caching. This allows hydraulic infrastructure to be evaluated together with the real terrain on which it is or may be constructed. | |||
; '''Local and standalone operation''' | |||
: AOWIS is being designed so that deployments do not depend on continuous Internet or cloud connectivity. Server, map, simulation, and user-interface components can be combined for local deployments, supporting the offline-first requirements of the project. | |||
The software remains under active development and should not yet be considered a complete production SCADA system. | |||
=== Towards a Full SCADA System === | |||
The next major development stage is to connect the existing infrastructure model and simulation environment to '''real infrastructure in continuous operation'''. | |||
The same network that is used for planning and hydraulic simulation should eventually represent the live system: | |||
* sensor measurements update the state of modelled infrastructure | |||
* pumps, valves, tanks, reservoirs, wells, treatment systems, and electrical systems can be monitored in real time | |||
* historical measurements and operational events are recorded | |||
* operators can inspect current and historical system behaviour | |||
* alarms and abnormal conditions are detected and presented clearly | |||
* hydraulic and water-quality models can be compared with observed conditions | |||
* authorized control commands can be issued to field equipment | |||
* automation can operate within explicitly defined safety limits | |||
* local systems continue operating safely when communication with higher-level systems is unavailable | |||
=== Telemetry and Field Communication === | |||
Initial AOWIS deployments are intended to use technologies such as: | |||
* [[Architecture:Protocols:LoRa/LoRaWAN]] for low-bandwidth long-range field communication | |||
* [[Architecture:Protocols:MQTT]] for telemetry and message transport | |||
The architecture should remain open to additional field and industrial protocols as required. | |||
Future work includes: | |||
* standardized representation of sensors, actuators, controllers, and communication endpoints | |||
* ingestion of continuous and event-based telemetry | |||
* manual measurements alongside automated measurements | |||
* reliable timestamping and measurement quality information | |||
* buffering during communication outages | |||
* synchronization after connectivity is restored | |||
* device health and communication-state monitoring | |||
=== Monitoring, Alarms, and Historian === | |||
AOWIS is intended to develop from its current simulation and visualization capabilities into a complete operational monitoring environment. | |||
Planned capabilities include: | |||
=== | * live network status | ||
* | * time-series storage and visualization | ||
** | * alarm and event management | ||
* configurable alarm thresholds and priorities | |||
* acknowledgement and audit trails | |||
* equipment status and fault reporting | |||
* operational dashboards | |||
* maintenance information | |||
* comparison of measured and simulated behaviour | |||
* long-term analysis of water demand, pressure, flow, quality, energy use, and equipment performance | |||
=== Control and Automation === | |||
AOWIS ultimately aims to support both manual and automatic control of infrastructure. | |||
This includes: | |||
* pumps | |||
* valves and actuators | |||
* storage tanks and water towers | |||
* wells and boreholes | |||
* treatment systems | |||
* irrigation systems | |||
* electrical and solar-energy infrastructure | |||
Automation must follow the core AOWIS principles of '''human-in-the-loop control, safe fallback behaviour, local autonomy, and operation under degraded conditions'''. | |||
Safety-critical protection should not depend solely on central software or network connectivity. Where appropriate, fundamental protections should remain implemented locally using simple and independently functioning electrical, mechanical, or controller-based systems. | |||
=== Model-Assisted Operation === | |||
A major objective is to combine traditional SCADA functionality with the hydraulic and infrastructure model already present in AOWIS. | |||
The live system may eventually use simulation and modelling to support: | |||
* expected-versus-measured pressure and flow comparison | |||
* leak and abnormal-consumption detection | |||
* detection of sensor or equipment faults | |||
* estimation of conditions at locations without sensors | |||
* tank and reservoir management | |||
* pump scheduling | |||
* energy optimization | |||
* water-quality tracking | |||
* evaluation of proposed operator actions before execution | |||
* demand forecasting | |||
* planning of network expansion and infrastructure changes | |||
This creates a path from a conventional SCADA display toward a continuously updated operational model of the physical water system. | |||
=== Solver-Independent Development === | |||
Although EPANET is currently the primary hydraulic solver, hydraulic calculations and solver-specific assumptions should remain isolated from the common AOWIS infrastructure model. | |||
This allows AOWIS to integrate additional simulators, optimization systems, agricultural models, or specialized engineering tools in the future without requiring the physical infrastructure model to be redesigned around a particular solver. | |||
=== Infrastructure and Water Treatment === | |||
Development is also expanding beyond distribution networks themselves. | |||
AOWIS should be capable of representing and supporting the planning and operation of complete water systems, including: | |||
* wells and boreholes | |||
* pumping stations | |||
* reservoirs and water towers | |||
* distribution networks | |||
* drinking-water treatment | |||
* desalination | |||
* disinfection | |||
* irrigation | |||
* electrical and solar-energy systems | |||
See [[Infrastructure:Main_Page|Infrastructure]] for documentation of physical infrastructure technologies and [[Reference:Main_Page|Reference]] for concrete engineering designs and example implementations. | |||
=== Hardware === | === Hardware === | ||
=== | Hardware development and research will continue alongside the software platform. | ||
Priorities include: | |||
* robust water-level, pressure, flow, and water-quality sensing | |||
* monitoring of solar and battery systems | |||
* locally serviceable field controllers | |||
* pump and valve interfaces | |||
* electrical protection | |||
* emergency shutdown systems | |||
* equipment suitable for heat, dust, unreliable power, and difficult logistics | |||
* designs that can be repaired using locally available skills and components where practical | |||
AOWIS does not require all hardware to be developed specifically for the project. Existing equipment should be integrated wherever it can satisfy the required interfaces, reliability, safety, and maintainability requirements. | |||
=== Long-Term Direction === | |||
The intended result is an integrated platform covering the complete lifecycle of water infrastructure: | |||
'''survey and planning → engineering and simulation → construction → commissioning → monitoring → control → maintenance → analysis → expansion''' | |||
The same open infrastructure model should connect these stages instead of requiring separate, incompatible systems for engineering, SCADA, maintenance, mapping, and simulation. | |||
AOWIS aims to make capabilities that are traditionally distributed across expensive and proprietary engineering, GIS, SCADA, telemetry, and asset-management products available through an open and interoperable platform suitable for both small local installations and larger water systems. | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 188: | Line 344: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
''AOWIS is an open, evolving standard. Contributions are welcome.'' | {{Header box | ||
| title = Partners | |||
| color = indigo | |||
| body = | |||
[[File:Afriticgroup.webp|250px|frameless|center|link=https://afriticgroup.com/]] | |||
}} | |||
''AOWIS is an open, evolving standard. Contributions are welcome. For contact, please visit us on [https://github.com/aowis-org GitHub]'' | |||
Latest revision as of 14:57, 5 September 2026

In less developed regions, such as rural areas and small towns in Africa, water distribution remains a significant challenge. While NGOs have been successfully supporting communities for decades by drilling wells, installing pumps, and sometimes building water towers, distributing water across a network on the surface is often difficult.
Local initiatives that take on these projects frequently encounter a situation where operating the system manually becomes unsustainable, requiring constant attention. Qualified personnel are scarce, and suitable technology to support automated or semi-automated operation is either unavailable under local constraints or too expensive.
This is where AOWIS aims to contribute: by providing an open standard for designing, deploying, and managing water and agricultural infrastructure in such environments. AOWIS supports both the planning phase—helping initiatives evaluate and design systems based on regional conditions such as topography—and the operational phase, including system monitoring, control, and maintenance.
In addition, AOWIS aims to support the training of local technicians and to collaborate closely with experienced NGOs and local initiatives that already operate and maintain such systems, in order to improve sustainability and reduce operational burden.

In environments where infrastructure is built over decades by many different actors using solutions from different vendors and manufacturers, systems become fragmented, forcing operators to manage multiple incompatible tools and workflows while making daily operation, maintenance, expansion, and staff training increasingly complex and costly.
This fragmentation often results in vendor lock-in, where systems depend on specific tools, expertise, or suppliers that may not remain available over the full lifecycle of the infrastructure.
An open standard provides a shared technical foundation that enables interoperability and ensures systems can be maintained and extended independently of any single product or provider.
AOWIS defines such a foundation for water and agricultural infrastructure under real-world operational constraints.

AOWIS is designed to operate under the real-world conditions faced by local initiatives. These include, among others:
- unreliable power supply
- intermittent connectivity
- diverse or aging equipment
- limited availability of trained personnel
- the need for safety and autonomous operation
AOWIS enables systems that continue to function safely and reliably, even under degraded or adverse conditions.
AOWIS addresses these operational challenges through the following principles:
- human-in-the-loop control
- offline-first operation
- safe fallback behavior
- modular and extensible logic
- shared infrastructure models
- training programs for local operators
- transparent governance
The goal is to make essential systems robust, maintainable, and locally operable.
If you are new to AOWIS, begin with:
- Design Philosophy
- Definitions
- Normative Requirements
- Module Template
- Contributor Guide - External
- Contributor Guide - Internal
- Writing Style Guide
- AI Usage Guide
- Research Form Guide
- Naming Convention Specification
- Change Log & Versioning
- This Wiki
These pages explain how to read, use, and contribute to the standard.
This index lists AOWIS pages that define normative requirements (MUST/SHOULD/MAY statements) and conformance rules.
Dev Rules — specs for writing and maintaining AOWIS
- REQ-AI: AI Usage Guide
Technical Standard — system behavior and data models
- REQ-MEAS, REQ-MEAS-UI: Unit System Requirements
- REQ-MEAS-UNI: Unit Identifiers
AOWIS documentation is organized into dedicated namespaces with clearly separated purposes.
The Standard namespace contains the normative requirements that define AOWIS compliance. The other namespaces provide the motivation, concepts, engineering knowledge, architectures, operational models, implementation guidance, reference designs, training material, and supporting information needed to understand, implement, and operate AOWIS systems.
- Motivation – Causal justification of design requirements based on real-world failures, constraints, and operational realities.
- Standard – The normative core of AOWIS. Defines requirements and definitions specifying what AOWIS-compliant systems MUST, SHOULD, or MAY do.
- Concepts – Core ideas, philosophy, rationale, and contextual understanding that explain AOWIS without prescribing a specific implementation.
- Architecture – High-level system structure, including controllers, layers, communication, data flows, and their interactions.
- Infrastructure – Physical technologies, systems, and components used in AOWIS deployments. Infrastructure pages describe classes of physical systems rather than specific implementation blueprints.
- Measurement – Definition and handling of sensor data, manual measurements, calibration, uncertainty, and derived physical values.
- Data – Data models, schemas, logging structures, synchronization formats, and data lifecycle rules.
- Operations – Runtime behavior, control logic, state transitions, fallback behavior, and decision-making during system operation.
- Modules – Reusable functional extensions that provide domain-specific capabilities within AOWIS.
- Reference – Non-normative concrete implementations, engineering blueprints, example deployments, and validated design patterns showing specific ways AOWIS systems may be built.
- Databases – Federated knowledge bases and structured supporting information used by AOWIS implementations.
- Governance – Certification, compliance, auditing, trust, licensing, versioning, and organizational governance.
- Training – Operator education, technical training, field guidance, documentation literacy, and capacity building.
- External – External projects, standards, technologies, and systems that relate to or influence AOWIS.
For a full overview, see the Table of Contents.

Roadmap
AOWIS has progressed beyond its initial conceptual phase. A substantial software foundation for modelling, simulating, visualizing, and eventually operating water infrastructure is under active development.
The long-term objective is a complete open-source SCADA, infrastructure modelling, simulation, and operational management platform for water and agricultural infrastructure. Planning, simulation, live monitoring, control, maintenance, and historical data should ultimately operate on the same shared infrastructure model.
EPANET currently provides the primary hydraulic and water-quality simulation engine, but AOWIS is not designed as an EPANET frontend. EPANET is one solver integrated into a broader, solver-independent AOWIS architecture.
Current Software State
The current AOWIS software stack already includes several major components:
- Shared infrastructure model
- The AOWIS server model provides a common representation of water infrastructure independently of a particular simulator, user interface, or field controller. Pumps, pipes, junctions, reservoirs, tanks, valves, controls, measurements, and related infrastructure can therefore be represented consistently throughout the system.
- Hydraulic and water-quality simulation
- A dedicated EPANET integration layer translates between the AOWIS model and EPANET and executes hydraulic and water-quality simulations. The integration supports network import and export, hydraulic behaviour, controls and rules, pumps and valves, water-quality analysis, diagnostics, simulation reports, and other EPANET functionality.
- Integration of EPANET-MSX is being developed to extend this to advanced multi-species water-quality and chemical reaction modelling.
- Network editor and monitoring interface
- The AOWIS graphical application provides tools for creating, importing, inspecting, simulating, and visualizing water networks. This includes geographic map views, terrain-aware 3D visualization, network monitoring views, simulation configuration, and analysis of simulation results.
- Geographic and terrain infrastructure
- AOWIS includes mapping and terrain services for geographic placement, elevation data, basemaps, terrain visualization, and local caching. This allows hydraulic infrastructure to be evaluated together with the real terrain on which it is or may be constructed.
- Local and standalone operation
- AOWIS is being designed so that deployments do not depend on continuous Internet or cloud connectivity. Server, map, simulation, and user-interface components can be combined for local deployments, supporting the offline-first requirements of the project.
The software remains under active development and should not yet be considered a complete production SCADA system.
Towards a Full SCADA System
The next major development stage is to connect the existing infrastructure model and simulation environment to real infrastructure in continuous operation.
The same network that is used for planning and hydraulic simulation should eventually represent the live system:
- sensor measurements update the state of modelled infrastructure
- pumps, valves, tanks, reservoirs, wells, treatment systems, and electrical systems can be monitored in real time
- historical measurements and operational events are recorded
- operators can inspect current and historical system behaviour
- alarms and abnormal conditions are detected and presented clearly
- hydraulic and water-quality models can be compared with observed conditions
- authorized control commands can be issued to field equipment
- automation can operate within explicitly defined safety limits
- local systems continue operating safely when communication with higher-level systems is unavailable
Telemetry and Field Communication
Initial AOWIS deployments are intended to use technologies such as:
- Architecture:Protocols:LoRa/LoRaWAN for low-bandwidth long-range field communication
- Architecture:Protocols:MQTT for telemetry and message transport
The architecture should remain open to additional field and industrial protocols as required.
Future work includes:
- standardized representation of sensors, actuators, controllers, and communication endpoints
- ingestion of continuous and event-based telemetry
- manual measurements alongside automated measurements
- reliable timestamping and measurement quality information
- buffering during communication outages
- synchronization after connectivity is restored
- device health and communication-state monitoring
Monitoring, Alarms, and Historian
AOWIS is intended to develop from its current simulation and visualization capabilities into a complete operational monitoring environment.
Planned capabilities include:
- live network status
- time-series storage and visualization
- alarm and event management
- configurable alarm thresholds and priorities
- acknowledgement and audit trails
- equipment status and fault reporting
- operational dashboards
- maintenance information
- comparison of measured and simulated behaviour
- long-term analysis of water demand, pressure, flow, quality, energy use, and equipment performance
Control and Automation
AOWIS ultimately aims to support both manual and automatic control of infrastructure.
This includes:
- pumps
- valves and actuators
- storage tanks and water towers
- wells and boreholes
- treatment systems
- irrigation systems
- electrical and solar-energy infrastructure
Automation must follow the core AOWIS principles of human-in-the-loop control, safe fallback behaviour, local autonomy, and operation under degraded conditions.
Safety-critical protection should not depend solely on central software or network connectivity. Where appropriate, fundamental protections should remain implemented locally using simple and independently functioning electrical, mechanical, or controller-based systems.
Model-Assisted Operation
A major objective is to combine traditional SCADA functionality with the hydraulic and infrastructure model already present in AOWIS.
The live system may eventually use simulation and modelling to support:
- expected-versus-measured pressure and flow comparison
- leak and abnormal-consumption detection
- detection of sensor or equipment faults
- estimation of conditions at locations without sensors
- tank and reservoir management
- pump scheduling
- energy optimization
- water-quality tracking
- evaluation of proposed operator actions before execution
- demand forecasting
- planning of network expansion and infrastructure changes
This creates a path from a conventional SCADA display toward a continuously updated operational model of the physical water system.
Solver-Independent Development
Although EPANET is currently the primary hydraulic solver, hydraulic calculations and solver-specific assumptions should remain isolated from the common AOWIS infrastructure model.
This allows AOWIS to integrate additional simulators, optimization systems, agricultural models, or specialized engineering tools in the future without requiring the physical infrastructure model to be redesigned around a particular solver.
Infrastructure and Water Treatment
Development is also expanding beyond distribution networks themselves.
AOWIS should be capable of representing and supporting the planning and operation of complete water systems, including:
- wells and boreholes
- pumping stations
- reservoirs and water towers
- distribution networks
- drinking-water treatment
- desalination
- disinfection
- irrigation
- electrical and solar-energy systems
See Infrastructure for documentation of physical infrastructure technologies and Reference for concrete engineering designs and example implementations.
Hardware
Hardware development and research will continue alongside the software platform.
Priorities include:
- robust water-level, pressure, flow, and water-quality sensing
- monitoring of solar and battery systems
- locally serviceable field controllers
- pump and valve interfaces
- electrical protection
- emergency shutdown systems
- equipment suitable for heat, dust, unreliable power, and difficult logistics
- designs that can be repaired using locally available skills and components where practical
AOWIS does not require all hardware to be developed specifically for the project. Existing equipment should be integrated wherever it can satisfy the required interfaces, reliability, safety, and maintainability requirements.
Long-Term Direction
The intended result is an integrated platform covering the complete lifecycle of water infrastructure:
survey and planning → engineering and simulation → construction → commissioning → monitoring → control → maintenance → analysis → expansion
The same open infrastructure model should connect these stages instead of requiring separate, incompatible systems for engineering, SCADA, maintenance, mapping, and simulation.
AOWIS aims to make capabilities that are traditionally distributed across expensive and proprietary engineering, GIS, SCADA, telemetry, and asset-management products available through an open and interoperable platform suitable for both small local installations and larger water systems.
AOWIS includes a transparent governance model to ensure:
- open participation
- clear certification processes
- stable versioning
- long‑term protection of the standard
See: Governance.
AOWIS is an open, evolving standard. Contributions are welcome. For contact, please visit us on GitHub

